|
|
CREATIVE DESTRUCTION
With a large land mass, natural resources, a stable government, and a
relatively well-educated workforce, the U.S. economy has some competitive
advantages in the world marketplace. Importantly, it also has a willingness to
endure, even embrace, change.
The U.S. economic system reflects what 20th-century Austrian economist Joseph
Schumpeter described as free-market capitalism's "creative destruction." Jobs,
companies, entire industries come and go.
Even cities and regions expand and, if they cannot adjust to change,
contract—some old industrialized cities in the "Rust Belt" of the Northeast and
Midwest and some agricultural states in the Great Plains have lost lots of
people to other cities and regions over decades.
In a free market, decisions about what to produce and what prices to charge
for products are made through the give and take of independent buyers and
sellers—sometimes a few, sometimes millions—not by government or powerful
private interests. Prices set this way best reflect the value of goods and
services and best guide production of what is most needed.
Americans also view free markets as a way of promoting individual freedom and
political pluralism and opposing concentrations of power. The U.S. federal
government renewed its commitment to market forces from the 1970s on by
dismantling regulations that had sheltered some industries—such as trucking,
airlines, and telecommunications—from market competition for decades.
Vigorous competition and a regulatory system that embraces technological
change have made the U.S. economy productive and provided American households
with relatively high incomes. U.S. productivity went up briskly in the 1990s,
with a peak 4.1 percent gain in 2002. This widened a lead over the European
Union and Japan, mostly by more effective application of information technology.
Since then, productivity gains have fallen off, only 1.6 percent in 2006.
A dynamic economy implies the freedom to fail. In the United States, business
failure does not carry the social stigma it does in some countries. Failure, in
fact, is often viewed as a valuable learning experience for the entrepreneur,
who may succeed the next time.
In 2005 the U.S. government recorded the creation of about 671,800 businesses
and the demise of about 544,800 others. Many small, little-known businesses
start up each year; some succeed, some fail.
Tens of thousands of businesses enter bankruptcy each year, and some of them
shut down permanently. In 2005 more than 39,000 businesses filed for bankruptcy.
In the United States even well-known big businesses fail. Trans World
Airlines, United Air Lines, Delta Air Lines, Northwest Airlines, US Airways,
Continental Airlines, Eastern Airlines, and Pan Am are just some of the major
commercial airlines that have filed for bankruptcy since air travel deregulation
in 1979 led to more vigorous competition. Some have re-emerged; others have
disappeared forever, their assets scavenged by surviving competitors.
Another measure of the U.S. economy's dynamism: Of the 12 companies that Dow
Jones listed in 1896 when it created its famous stock index to represent the
industrial sector, only one, General Electric, remains on the index now. Others
disappeared from the index as they were acquired by other companies, split into
smaller companies, became relatively smaller players in the economy, or simply
dissolved. Some of the companies that replaced them started out as small
businesses.
So does the large number of small businesses help explain the U.S. economy's
dynamism?
|